A Comparison of Three Nutritional Assessment Tools in Predicting Nutritional- Related Clinical Outcomes Among Renal Patients at The Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Ghana
Abstract
Renal impairment (RI) is a prevalent condition characterised by suboptimal kidney function, often leading to undernutrition and significant metabolic disturbances. The global rise in RI, especially in developing countries, highlights the need for effective nutritional assessment tools. A cross- sectional descriptive study was conducted at the Nephrology Unit of Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital (KATH) in Ghana to compare the effectiveness of three nutritional assessment tools – the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA), Subjective Global Assessment (SGA), and Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) – in predicting nutritional-related clinical outcomes among 110 renal patients. Nutritional status was assessed using the MNA, SGA, and MUST tools. Data were analysed using SPSS version 23. The study found that 49.1% of patients were malnourished according to the MNA, compared to 16.4% by MUST and 12.7% by SGA. Significant associations were observed between the MNA scores and clinical outcomes such as declined food intake, weight- change, and BMI. The MNA showed superior predictive capability for these outcomes compared to the SGA and MUST. There was a significant gender and age difference in nutritional status, with female patients and those aged 51-60 years being at higher risk of malnutrition. The MNA was found to be the most effective tool in predicting nutritional-related clinical outcomes in renal patients, supporting its use in clinical settings for early identification and intervention. Regular training of healthcare professionals in using the MNA is recommended to enhance early detection and management of malnutrition, ultimately improving patient outcomes.
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Science and Technology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
